Social

Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by retention conflicting ideas simultaneously. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people pose a motivational drive to reduce dissonance. They do this by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and actions.[2] Dissonance is also reduced by justifying, blaming, and denying. It is headliner of the most influential and extensively studied theories in pleasant psychology. A closely related term, cognitive disequilibrium, was coined by jean Piaget to refer to the experience of a discrepancy between something locomote and something already known or believed. Experience can friction with expectations, as, for warning, with buyers remorse following the purchase of an expensive item. In a state of dissonance, people may feel surprise,[2] dread, guilt, anger, or embarrassment. citizenry are biased to think of their choices as correct, despite either contrary evidence. This bias gives dissonance theory its pre dictive power, seclude away light on otherwise puzzling monstrous and pestiferous behavior.

A classical display case of this idea (and the line of credit of the cheek sour grapes) is expressed in the fable The pull someones leg and the Grapes by Aesop (ca. 620564 BCE). In the story, a shed sees some high-hanging grapes and wishes to discharge them. When the fox is unable to think of a way to exceed them, he surmises that the grapes are probably not worth eating, as they must(prenominal) not be ripe or that they are sour. This example follows a soma: one desires something, finds it unattainable, and reduces ones dissonance by criticizing it. Jon Elster calls this word ! form adaptive prefeIf you want to get a full essay, arrange it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay